Four engines, one verdict — pick the tier that fits the question

2026-05-20 · Natkal

Pricing-page UX usually buries the costs and dares you to find them. We did the opposite: four named research tiers, one canonical verdict format, and the caps stated on the same page.

The same briefing, four depths

Every verdict — Quorum Lite, Quorum Pro, Quorum Max, or Quorum Ultra-Max — writes the same canonical Executive_Briefing.md contract with a ## TL;DR at the top. The verdict shape (chip + bell-curve + named dissents + falsifiers) doesn't change. Research depth, seat backbone, prompts, latency, and the daily ceiling do.

Quorum Lite — free, on our private GPU

Quorum Pro — paid, cloud council

Quorum Max — premium, frontier debate

Quorum Ultra-Max

Multi-market by default

Every tier runs against US, India (NSE / BSE), China (Shanghai / Shenzhen), Hong Kong, Korea (KOSPI / KOSDAQ), Singapore and Japan tickers natively. The seats don't care which market the ticker is on — the same filing reads, the same bell-curve verdict, the same canonical synthesizer. You add the ticker with its standard suffix and the rest of the pipeline handles it.

Pick the tier per question, not per subscription

Most days Quorum Lite is enough. Quorum Pro handles broad daily research. Quorum Pro+ unlocks Quorum Max for the consequential calls. Quorum Ultra-Max is invite only. Team / RIA is a five-seat Pro plan, not a fifth engine. Full comparison →

Claim a free seat →